I've got my eye on you

Instead of paying them directly, let the money go straight to the charities they support.

that's ridiculous. i tend to avoid movies with any of these broads. especially sandra bullock. how the hell is she still even in this club?

jennybean said:

Instead of paying them directly, let the money go straight to the charities they support.

Exactly! That would be the smart thing to do!

Only Movie I Have Ever Watched With Reese Witherspoon In It Was Just Like Heaven. Most Of Those Movies Are Crap

Reese Witherspoon is a good character actress.

But all celebrities should just donate more money to charity.
They should give at least $40 million.

Just don't employ them and then they won't expect as much money...

Though I don't see why they are expected to donate to charities... it's their money, and even if it would be good, you can't tell someone what to do with their money.

laurenniko said:

Though I don't see why they are expected to donate to charities... it's their money, and even if it would be good, you can't tell someone what to do with their money.

But if they're already donating, which they do, just cut out the middle man and give the money directly to the charities they support. That was the point being made.

jennybean said:

laurenniko said:Though I don't see why they are expected to donate to charities... it's their money, and even if it would be good, you can't tell someone what to do with their money.But if they're already donating, which they do, just cut out the middle man and give the money directly to the charities they support. That was the point being made.

Oh, fair doos.

instead of paying them such high falutin amounts..there should be a staid amount say..highest 3 million coz sorry folks that amount ..ten millionand over is such an astronomical amount that the mind boggles.There is no need for such decadent amounts.an across the board amount should be talked and discussed and eventually implemented,yes they deserve payment but im sure and correct m eif im wrong 3 milllion could be quite suffivient ,already they must have enough money tolast several lifetimes...as for charities..also im sure theres ample to give to them from their huge bank accounts..not to mention the freebies all actors receive at any function ie the oscars etc where ":gifts"of 10 000 dollar watches ,clothes diamond jewellery ,phones and the list goes on...enough already! these people like mr harry potter himself are given too too much why its enoughto feed a small country or pay for aids medications for several thousand people...........egads ...sorry i ranted....just boils my paint tubes!!

jennybean said:

Instead of paying them directly, let the money go straight to the charities they support.

yeh..to me there just wasteing all that money on people who dont even need so much-_-

No actor should make that much.
Even though I do love a few of those actors, anyone who thinks they really deserve that paycheck is completely full of themselves and needs a slap in the face.

I think this is not about who does it in a way and who don't, i think it;s about who deserve it or not.
yara
http://poxline.buzznet.com/user/poll s/77751/who-said-society-wont-let/